“So he comes to a town of Samaria called Sychar, near the field that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.”
- ἔρχεταιI come, go
- οὖνtherefore, then
- εἰςinto, in, among, till, for
- πόλινa city
- τῆςthe
- ΣαμαρείαςSamaria
- λεγομένηνI say, speak
- ΣυχὰρSychar
- πλησίονnear, nearby, a neighbor
- τοῦthe
- χωρίουa place, piece of land, field
- ὃwho, which, what, that
- ἔδωκενI offer, give
- ἸακὼβJacob
- τῷthe
- ἸωσὴφJoseph
- τῷthe
- υἱῷa son, descendent
- αὐτοῦhe, she, it, they, them, same
He-comes therefore into city of-the Samaria being-called Sychar near the field which gave Jacob to-the Joseph the son of-him.
He comes therefore into a city of Samaria, being called Sychar, near the field which Jacob gave to Joseph his son.
Historic present ἔρχεται vivifies narrative immediacy. Conjunction οὖν marks logical sequence from 4:4's theological necessity (ἔδει). Preposition εἰς + accusative πόλιν denotes terminal motion. Genitive τῆς Σαμαρείας functions adjectivally (partitive/locative). Present passive participle λεγομένην attributively modifies πόλιν, introducing nomenclature. Preposition πλησίον governs genitive τοῦ χωρίου (proximity). Relative pronoun ὃ (accusative neuter singular) serves as direct object of ἔδωκεν; constative aorist indicative ἔδωκεν summarizes completed historical act. Nominative Ἰακὼβ is subject; dative indirect object construction τῷ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ (double article for emphasis); genitive αὐτοῦ refers anaphorically to Ἰακὼβ.
Word order places ἔρχεται first, foregrounding Jesus' agency and the dramatic present. οὖν occupies post-positive second position per Greek norm, syntactically subordinating logical connection to verbal action. The articular genitive τῆς Σαμαρείας post-modifies πόλιν, delaying ethnic/geographic identification for rhetorical effect. The participial phrase λεγομένην Συχὰρ is embedded attributively, suspending the name until after "city of Samaria" is established, thus layering identity (Samaritan, then Sychar). The prepositional phrase πλησίον τοῦ χωρίου precedes its own modifying relative clause (ὃ ἔδωκεν...), creating suspense: proximity noted, then historical grounding supplied. The relative clause is hypotactic, embedding patriarchal memory within geographic description. The final genitive chain (τῷ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ αὐτοῦ) expands the dative, adding genealogical gravitas through double articulation and pronominal anchoring.
Historic present ἔρχεται invites auditors into real-time narrative unfolding, a common oral vividness device. The delayed identification (πόλιν... τῆς Σαμαρείας... λεγομένην Συχὰρ) builds tension aurally: hearers first register "city," then "of Samaria" (triggering ethnic/theological alert), then the specific name. The relative clause (ὃ ἔδωκεν Ἰακὼβ...) functions mnemonically, cueing communal recollection of Genesis-Joshua traditions without needing to quote them—ancient audiences would recognize the patriarchal topography. The double article (τῷ... τῷ) in the dative phrase creates rhythmic solemnity, signaling weighty ancestral inheritance, audibly distinct from simpler prose. Silent reading loses the cumulative suspense of delayed modifiers and the gravitas of double articulation; the eye can parse the whole clause at once, flattening the oral drama of progressive revelation.
Text-centered
The verse is an itinerary notice, but syntactically dense, embedding geography within theology. The historic present ἔρχεται sustains narrative momentum from 4:4's programmatic ἔδει ("it was necessary"), making arrival not incidental but fulfillment of divine necessity. The genitive τῆς Σαμαρείας functions as ethnic marker, foregrounding boundary-crossing (Jewish Messiah entering non-Jewish space). The passive participle λεγομένην distances the narrator from the name Sychar, leaving its significance (whether corruption, historical village, or symbolic) suspended. The relative clause anchors present geography in patriarchal past (Genesis 33:19; 48:22; Joshua 24:32), creating typological resonance: Jacob's gift to Joseph prefigures Jesus' gift (living water, 4:10) and the theological inversion whereby Samaritan woman becomes recipient of revelation. The syntax layers present action (ἔρχεται), ethnic identity (Σαμαρείας), local nomenclature (Συχὰρ), spatial proximity (πλησίον), and covenantal history (ὃ ἔδωκεν Ἰακὼβ), making geography itself a theological argument. The double article construction (τῷ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ) solemnizes inheritance, anticipating the woman's invocation of "our father Jacob" (4:12) and setting up Jesus' redefinition of ancestral worship (4:20-24).
Author-centered
John embeds this verse within the larger "hour" theology (2:4; 4:21, 23; 7:30; 8:20; 12:23; 13:1; 17:1): Jesus' journey through Samaria is not geographic necessity but theological inevitability (ἔδει, 4:4), advancing the revelation of universal worship beyond ethnic boundaries. The historic present ἔρχεται aligns the reader with the narrator's "now" (ἔρχεται ὥρα, 4:21, 23), collapsing narrative time and eschatological time. The invocation of Jacob and Joseph evokes ancestral memory but also sets up ironic reversal: the woman will claim Jacob (4:12), but Jesus will supersede him (4:13-14). The choice of Sychar (historically debated—Shechem? Askar?) may be Johannine theological geography rather than strict cartography; Shechem was the site of covenant renewal (Joshua 24) and Samaritan schism (1 Kings 12), making it symbolically apt for the redefinition of worship "in spirit and truth" (4:23-24). The passive λεγομένην suggests the evangelist reports local nomenclature without endorsing it, maintaining narrative distance. The double article (τῷ... τῷ) in the dative phrase is Johannine stylistic solemnity, paralleling similar constructions elsewhere (1:1; 6:51). Authorial intent: anchor the encounter in covenantal geography to heighten the scandal and glory of Jesus' self-revelation to a Samaritan, fulfilling the universal mission nascent in 1:9-12; 3:16-17.
Reader-centered
The reader's interpretive framework decisively shapes how geography functions here. A reader trained in historical-critical method will focus on the Sychar/Shechem identification problem, seeking archaeological corroboration and weighing textual variants (though none are grounded here). A reader formed by covenantal theology will hear the Jacob-Joseph invocation as typological: Jacob's well (4:6) becomes the site where Jesus offers water surpassing patriarchal gift, and Joseph's inheritance foreshadows the "true worshipers" (4:23) transcending ethnic boundaries. A reader attuned to Johannine irony will note the passive λεγομένην and the delayed naming of Sychar, suspecting symbolic freight (Sychar as "liar-town"? "drunkard"? a pun on Shechem?). A Samaritan reader, historically, would hear validation (Jesus enters our space, honors our patrimony) and challenge (he redefines worship away from Gerizim, 4:21). A post-supersessionist Christian reader may wrestle with how to honor the text's universalizing thrust (worship "in spirit and truth" transcends place) without erasing the particularity of Jesus' Jewish-Samaritan boundary-crossing or dishonoring contemporary Samaritan identity. A feminist reader will note that this verse sets the stage for the longest recorded dialogue between Jesus and any individual in the Gospels—and that individual is a woman, a Samaritan, in a space dense with patriarchal memory (Jacob, Joseph), yet she becomes apostle to her city (4:39-42). The reader's own position vis-à-vis ethnic, geographic, and gender boundaries will determine whether this verse reads as inclusivity, supersession, or both in unresolved tension. Silent reading privatizes the encounter; communal oral reading in Samaritan or Jewish or mixed-ethnic contexts would make the verse's boundary-crossing socially immediate, not abstractly theological.
Sychar is likely Askar (modern village near Nablus) or symbolic corruption of Shechem, chosen for theological reasons; the geography is Johannine construction subordinate to theological drama
Sychar is Shechem, the ancient covenant site; the identification is literal and theologically significant (Jesus enters the place of covenant renewal to establish new worship)
Sychar near Shechem is honored geography; Jacob's gift to Joseph is Samaritan patrimony, validating Gerizim worship; Jesus' visit is acknowledgment, though his redefinition of worship (4:21-24) is contested
We endorse no tradition. The basis is shown so you can examine and decide for yourself.
The double article construction τῷ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἷῷ αὐτοῦ is textually disputed: SBLGNT, WH, and NA28 include the second article (τῷ before υἱῷ), while Tregelles and the Byzantine text (RP) omit it. The inclusion intensifies the solemnity and specificity of the inheritance (articular "the son" as distinct recipient), while omission yields smoother syntax. The divergence reflects editorial judgment on whether Johannine style favors emphatic double articulation or simpler dative construction; no manuscript data is grounded here, so the basis is stylistic-editorial preference among printed editions. Theologically, both readings sustain the patriarchal inheritance theme, but the double article (SBLGNT/NA28) amplifies the covenantal weight.
Every parsing above is retrieved, not generated. Open this to see the dataset it came from, word by word.